printing Print

The site you are about to visit contain(s) information created and maintained by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience.

The U.S. District Court of Northern District of Illinois does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this outside information; nor does it control or guarantee the on-going availability, maintenance, or security of these internet sites.

Further, the inclusion of links is not intended to reflect their importance or to endorse any views expressed, or products or services offered, on these outside sites, or the organizations sponsoring the sites.



Motions for Summary Judgment

The Court requires strict compliance with Local Rule 56.1 in the briefing of all summary judgment motions.  In addition, to assist the Court in reviewing the factual record submitted in connection with summary judgment motions, the Court requires that courtesy copies of the motion and memorandum of law, depositions and other materials relied upon in support of the motion as required by Local Rule 56.1(a)(1)-(3) or in opposition to the motion as required by Local Rule 56.1(b)(1)-(3) must be delivered to chambers within one business day of filing.  The courtesy copy of the appendix must be securely bound, must separately tab each document, and must contain an index identifying what document is contained under each tab.  All statements of undisputed material facts offered by the moving party under Local Rule 56.1(a)(3), or statements of additional facts offered by the responding party under Local Rule 56.1(b)(3), must list the facts in short, numbered paragraphs that refrain from argument.  Argument must be reserved for the moving party’s memorandum of law.  Each numbered fact statement must contain a specific citation to affidavits, depositions or other materials that support the fact statement, as well as to the tab(s) in the appendix where those materials may be found.  Failure to provide support for a statement of fact may result in that alleged “fact” being disregarded. 

All responses to statements of undisputed material fact offered by the responding party under Local Rule 56.1(b)(3), or responses to statements of additional fact offered by the moving party under Local Rule 56.1(a), shall be in a format similar to that used in answering a complaint.  That is, the response must repeat each numbered paragraph of the fact statement, and then immediately following each numbered statement must state whether the alleged fact is “undisputed” or “disputed.”  As with the fact statements submitted under Local Rule 56.1(a)(3) and 56.1(b)(3), the responses to those fact statements must refrain from argument.  The significance or lack of significance of a disputed or undisputed fact may be argued in the respondent’s legal memorandum.  If a particular fact is “undisputed,” nothing more should be said in the response.  If a particular fact assertion is “disputed” in whole or in part, the response must state what part of the assertion is disputed and must contain a specific citation to the supporting affidavits, depositions or other materials as well as to the tab(s) in the appendix where those materials may be found.  Failure to provide support for an alleged fact dispute may result in that fact being deemed admitted. 

In accordance with Local Rule 56.1, absent prior leave of Court, a movant shall not file more than eighty (80) separately numbered statements of undisputed material fact, and a party responding to a summary judgment motion shall not file more than forty (40) separately numbered statements of additional fact under Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).  The Court reminds parties that the fact statements under Local Rule 56.1(a)(3) and Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B) “shall consist of short numbered paragraphs.”

In appropriate cases, the Court may direct the parties to provide courtesy copies of their filings in searchable PDF format, as opposed to hard copies.  Highly involved cases with substantial exhibits are likely candidates for this approach.  Counsel are encouraged to raise this option for courtesy copy production if counsel believes it would be more efficient or helpful to the parties and/or the Court.




Note: The court does not control nor can it guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this information. Neither is it intended to endorse any view expressed nor reflect its importance by inclusion in this site.
#CMPID978